Project 4 - Participation: Game Pitch Presentation Comments and Review

Other Blog Comments:

Matt Mensher

-        Good voice projection. Need more eye contact and fluency.

Evan LeClaire

-        Need more fluency. Excellent voice projection and decent eye contact. Passable design of pitch document with appropriate color palette used.

Joseph Verducci

-        Need better voice projection. Work on the pitch design.

Olivia Gutierrez

-        Good voice projection. Need to work on relaying your message more concisely. The pitch design should be updated.

Alexander Weitzner

-        Work on pitch document design. Be more concise with rules’ explanation.

Matt Fishman

-        The color palette is passable but needs more refinement. Good presentation with concise rules. Need more eye contact with audience.

Brian Eisenberg

-        Need to update and upgrade design of pitch document. Excellent voice projection and interaction with audience. Good eye contact. Great overall presentation, but need a better pitch document to support it.

John Aromando

-        Very confident and concise in presenting to the audience. Excellent eye contact. Great voice projection. Work to make the game pitch document more graphical and better organized.

Review:

Based on the comments I've gotten, there's certainly some work to be done on my design for the game pitch document. Some of the criticism has been based on things that I accept as legitimate mistakes which I will rectify upon final modification of the design. The mistakes had escaped my attention until after publishing the document. Nonetheless, I will work on improving the color scheme and modify some of the graphics to better fit the purpose of the document. I think my visual hierarchy needs some work as well. So, I will basically try to overhaul as much of this document as I can to make it more concise and visually appealing to the eye.